PMH/Was it really like that?: ‘Rock Island Line’ and the instabilities of causational popular music histories

Resource added
How to Cite: Brocken, M. (2004). Was it really like that? ‘Rock Island Line’ and the instabilities of causational popular music histories. Popular Music History, 1(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1558/pomh.v1i2.147

Full description

In an attempt to re-think ways in which the popular music past is represented, Mike Brocken looks at Lonnie Donegan’s recording of ‘Rock Island Line’ and questions the historical purposes that this seminal recording appears to have served for subsequent popular music writers and historians. Donegan, according to Brocken, is afforded very little historical authenticity due to his flirtation with the mainstream, while ‘Rock Island Line’ is historicized only as a form of 'ur-history’ to apparently more authentic soundtracks that appeared to follow. By focusing more upon space, time and synchronic fact (and away from the ‘event’ that can be more easily narrated), Brocken suggests that our historical knowledge of this seminal recording has been constructed in very specific ways. He concludes by suggesting that the epistomological, methodological and ideological factors concerning the historiography of skiffle, Donegan and ‘Rock Island Line’ in serving ‘rock-ist’ and ‘folk-ist’ narratives, all require urgent investigation.

Download image “PMH/Was it really like that?: ‘Rock Island Line’ and the instabilities of causational popular music histories”
  • type
    Image
  • created on
  • file format
    jpg
  • file size
    21 KB
  • container title
    Popular Music History
  • creator
    Michael Brocken
  • issn
    1743-1646 (Online)
  • issue
    1.2
  • publisher
    Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • publisher place
    Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • rights holder
    Equinox Publishing Ltd.
  • doi