Skip to main contentResource added 
Response to the Panel, “What Is Wrong with Pagan Studies? Critiquing Methodologies”: Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, Baltimore, Maryland, November 24, 2013

How to Cite:
Arthur, S. (2014). Response to the Panel, “What Is Wrong with Pagan Studies? Critiquing Methodologies”: Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, Baltimore, Maryland, November 24, 2013. Pomegranate, 15(1-2), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1558/pome.v15i1-2.164
Full description
This article is the culminating response to a panel of speakers discussing the strengths and weaknesses of Markus Davidsen's 2012 published critique of Contemporary Pagan scholarship in the edited volume "The Handbook of Contemporary Paganism" (2008). Here, the author summarizes the previous three speakers and provides an alternative perspective for understanding Davidsen's critique - one that was very well received in the panel itself.
- typeImage
- created on
- file formatjpeg
- file size66 KB
- container titleThe Pomegranate
- creatorShawn Arthur
- issn1743-1735 (online)
- issue15.1/2
- publisherEquinox Publishing Ltd.
- publisher placeSheffield, United Kingdom
- rightsEquinox Publishing Ltd.
- volume
- doi
Manifold uses cookies
We use cookies to analyze our traffic. Please decide if you are willing to accept cookies from our website. You can change this setting anytime in Privacy Settings.